The author nearly seems to concede that installing applications is about the same before arbitrarily deciding that it's easier to backup and restore on Linux because it's "only a few keystrokes." OP apparently never having heard of rsync which works fine on OS X and is as "automatic" as running apt by hand. They also left out the fact that you can make USB install drives for all the recent previous versions of OS X. The author mentions that rolling back a release is easier in Linux, despite explaining that both require a backup and reinstall. I'll try to keep my other points shorter. I agree, but if you're trying to be practical it seems prudent not to leave out lots of relevant information about Macs just because you don't prefer using them. The article author mentioned this isn't about which is better, but which is more practical. Heard of my share of wireless issues with Macs too, not trying to suggest perfection there, but one point in Apple's favor is that the small number of hardware profiles makes troubleshooting easier. What if booting to the other kernel doesn't solve the problem because of a misconfig later in the boot? What if the bug report goes unanswered, is closed as unreproducible, or just never gets fixed? While my experience is that Linux drivers in the past few years are pretty fantastic, I can hardly say they've been perfect.
The factual inaccuracies/omissions didn't help either. SysadmEnt: "Found this to be pretty one-sided and a bit nit-picky at points. Linux redditors responded with their own thoughts about OS X versus Linux: And each of those individuals being supported by me love the fact that they don't have to upgrade their hardware every two years. I ought to know – any machine I support runs Linux. If Linux distributions had the same level of consumer tech support available that Windows and OS X does, we'd see adoption number exploding. There is also something to be said about having physical media for installing your operating system. Linux also avoids the use of special ID logins to re-install software.
Linux on the desktop avoids planned obsolescence and allows the end user to customize their computing experience to meet their needs. This article isn't about which platform is “better.” Instead, it's a matter of which platform is more practical.
In this article, I'll explore why I believe Linux is a more practical solution than OS X, if local techs would simply bother to support it. In fact, in some cases, it's completely overkill. Yet it isn't always the most practical operating system for the casual end user. It offers access to pro-level applications that many industries rely on. OS X is a solid operating system for those who enjoy Apple's vision of the ideal desktop.
0 kommentar(er)
